The Benefits Of Pets For Children

A review of the literature concludes that pets may get got psychological benefits for children – such equally amend self-esteem – but to a greater extent than question is needed.

By Zazie Todd, PhD

The review, past times Rebecca Purewal (University of Liverpool) et al involved searching the scientific literature from 1960 to 2016 for studies that examine the effects of pets on children’s psychological health. 22 studies were identified too analysed further.

The results exhibit benefits inwards some areas, but non plenty evidence to push clit conclusions inwards other areas. The newspaper too considers the potential mechanisms for such effects.

The scientists write,

“This newspaper provides a review of the evidence on the effects of pet ownership on emotional, behavioural, cognitive, educational too social development. Overall, the evidence suggests that pet ownership, too domestic dog ownership inwards particular, may create goodness these outcomes for children too adolescents. However, the evidence is mixed partly due to a wide make of dissimilar methodological approaches too varying character of studies.”

The scientists used quite wide criteria inwards selecting the studies for their review. The 22 studies they looked at include 2 that get got been covered on : Geerdts et al on pets too children’s agreement of biological concepts, too Rhoades et al on the effects of pets on the mental wellness of homeless youth.

First, the expert news. Purewal et al flora evidence that pets may live on expert for children’s emotional health, peculiarly inwards damage of amend self-esteem too reduced loneliness. There too seemed to live on benefits inwards damage of beingness amend able to accept some other person’s perspective, too for intellectual development.

They too flora social benefits – bigger social networks, amend social competence, too to a greater extent than social play. (Interestingly, pets get got too been flora to increase social networks for adults).

However, they did non actually uncovering evidence for improvements inwards depression too anxiety, too at that topographic point was non plenty evidence to come upwardly to whatever conclusions nearly demeanor development.

The newspaper describes several potential mechanisms past times which pets mightiness create goodness children. The effects of the hormone oxytocin may Pb to reduced stress, too pets may furnish social support. Pets may attention to consider children’s needs for a secure attachment, too this could live on peculiarly of import inwards cases where a kid has hapless attachment to their parents. Indeed, it is possible that attachment to pets may live on to a greater extent than of import than precisely owning a pet.

The authors furnish illustrations of how effects mightiness occur for each of the domains where an lawsuit was found. For example, improved educational outcomes may live on due to amend social back upwardly too reduced stress, which inwards plow may crusade amend executive performance which volition improve learning. Interactions amongst the pet (such equally having conversations amongst the pet) may too Pb to amend linguistic communication skills too social cognition.

Potential benefits of pets may too live on related to the phase of a child’s development. For example, immature children who are learning nearly social relationships may peculiarly create goodness from interactions amongst a pet. For self-esteem, it seems that pet ownership is of most create goodness to younger children (under 6) too those over 10 years old.

The review highlights a disclose of problems amongst the available evidence, such equally minor sample sizes,  only collecting information at ane time-point (therefore non able to assess potential effects over time), too sometimes classifying children equally non-pet owners at a item fourth dimension when they may get got previously had a pet that is instantly deceased.

Also, at that topographic point are differences inwards the kinds of pets studied, too although it appears that dogs had the greatest potential, inwards some cases other pets (that were non dogs or cats) were non included equally pets inwards the research. So to a greater extent than question is needed to sympathize the human relationship children get got amongst dissimilar kinds of pets, too whether this way some pets are to a greater extent than probable to live on beneficial than others.

The authors too highlight potential confounding variables. For example, at that topographic point mightiness live on differences inwards the sort of nurture who acquires a pet compared to those who don’t, too it’s possible this could occupation organisation human relationship for some of the effects.

As good equally summarizing the literature, the article highlights the involve for amend character evidence on the possible benefits of pets. While the potential risks of pets are exterior the reach of the paper, they are mentioned. The most obvious mightiness live on the opportunity of domestic dog bites, which immature children are peculiarly vulnerable to, but at that topographic point are too risks of allergies, acquiring an infection from a pet, too of grief on the loss of pet.

That's why it's too so helpful to know that question finds dogs too cats may create goodness children inwards some aspects, such equally improved self-esteem too bigger social networks. The review highlights priorities for futurity research, too shows that improving the character of question inwards this champaign is essential. Hopefully it volition live on a catalyst for better-designed too longitudinal studies inwards this area.

The newspaper is opened upwardly access too so yous tin read it inwards full. You tin too follow ane of the authors of the study, Dr. Carri Westgarth, on twitter.

How create yous cry upwardly pets mightiness attention children?

You mightiness too like: Reading to dogs may improve literacy and what pets create children get got too which create they prefer?

You may too Animal Book Club is reading this month

Get merch  

Support me on Ko-fi

Visit my Amazon store

This page contains affiliate links.

Reference
Purewal, R., Christley, R., Kordas, K., Joinson, C., Meints, K., Gee, N., & Westgarth, C. (2017). Companion Animals too Child/Adolescent Development: Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 Systematic Review of the Evidence International Journal of Environmental Research too Public Health, 14 (3) DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14030234
Photos: Africa Studio (top) too zagorodnaya (both Shutterstock.com).

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. As an Etsy affiliate, I earn from qualifying Etsy purchases.